Dian's Column
Dian's Archive

Lavine/Liberman Archive




Lipper
Muriel Siebert & Co.



The Naked Short-Selling Truth



By Dian Vujovich

There’s something decidedly sexy about naked short-selling. I mean, how can you not think that it is risky? And it is. So risky that when markets are rapidly falling, naked short-sellers often help in that downward calamity.

But now, all of that nakedness has come to a halt.

If you’re a short-seller of stocks, you’re betting that the price of a stock is going to fall. The strategy requires borrowing stock from a company at one price, returning it to the lender at a lower price and your profit comes from the difference between those two prices.

The “naked” part happens when a short-seller doesn’t borrow the stock before they sell it.

Last fall, when the market was tumbling downward, there was a lot of nakedness on Wall Street as hedge funds and other big-time investors played the naked short-selling game. Yesterday, however, the SEC made permanent an emergency rule put in place last fall to reduce the abusive short-selling that was going on.

The new SEC rule includes a requirement that brokers must promptly buy or borrow securities to deliver on a short sale

As you might expect, the rule has plenty of ah-hums in it. For instance, it creates more disclosure from traders like hedge funds, but delays the information necessary to report it by a month.

To learn more about the new naked truths of short-selling here are two sources: http://tinyurl.com/mm3tj6 and http://tinyurl.com/km5rrx. In the second URL from a New York Times.com story, click on “planes to require more disclosures” and you’ll be able to download, then read, 100 pages of copy from the SEC regarding this subject.


To read more articles, please visit the column archive.




[ top ]